Some biblical prospective to "attitudes" of this site.

Some thoughts that have occurred to me from reading the bible struck me as applicable to the appearance of "judgmental" content presented on this site. Things about the government and of the countless alphabet soup government agencies and many other laws, businesses, organizations, etc. that are portrayed as seemingly either incompetent, corrupt or both. The comments and statements made are not done so diplomatically, as a petition is not being made to "them" to change. If "they" can't see the harm they do for themselves and turn to do things differently then such meek cries from us are moot and futile. Nevertheless, though not diplomatic, such statements and comments are said not to judge, for that is Gods jurisdiction and aught be left to how and when He sees fit, but to make aware the traps, snares and pitfalls to anyone that seeks understanding. I feel called, perhaps by my humanity to take these necessary risks of "stirring up the water" and address such things, despite the potential that I be caught in the cross fire of "their" wrath here and now, and if so then so be it. Gods eventual judgment there after will be my vindication and "their" inheritance.

Things I have read and thoughts I have had while reading the bible have shown me how judgment and pointing out others wrongs is dangerous to say the least. For example John the Baptist told Herod it was not lawful for him to marry his brothers wife Herodias. Herodias heard this and eventually had her revenge against John by having him beheaded. (Mathew 14: 1-12) (Mark 6: 14-29)

How does this apply? Well we don't know all the circumstances but it seems that in a sense John stated some inconvenient truth to someone that couldn't handle the truth on truths terms so it was instead handled on her (Herodias) terms. Did Herod seek marital input from John or did John seek out Herod? IDK (I Don't Know). Did God give John this mission and message to deliver to Herod or was it a message relayed by John's own convictions? IDK. Did John say such things publicly which caused humiliation and conceived resentment by Herodias? I Don't think anyone could have a definate answer to any of these questions however we can certainly see the results of John having said/done so. The point here to tie things said on infoexposed to things mentioned from this reference of bible history is this; things that aren't right need to be addressed. The problems needed to be pointed out. The issues need to get resolved. The powers that be need to be made aware that the wrongs being committed are obvious and need to stop. When you begin pointing these things out to those with power to change, for some reason things usually don't end up going well. These inconvenient truths are not well received as in the example of John The Baptist. One major difference with that biblical example and the situation we face today (America especially) is this: The way I see it Herod and Herodias's extracurricular  escapades harmed no one. Their bedroom behavior was God's and their own business and from best as I can tell I see it causing little if any harm to anyone; unlike the correlation I am making with present day issues where we have clear and present harm caused from incremental allowance, collaboration, and enforcement that continually and systematically sides with and supports further and further acts of malevolence. So did John really need to address such issues? I don't know, however I certainly know someone needs to be grabbing the loud speaker and addressing the ones now because in this current situation countless of millions are needlessly taken advantage of, deceived, harmed and killed by what goes on, only some of which is displayed, grasped and discussed on the infoexposed website.

Another perfect biblical example of the purpose and call of infoexposed is the man himself, Jesus. He never personally cut down anyone but he would confront an issue with anything and everyone which needed an issue confronted. You could say that's what got him crucified. The Pharisees, Sadducees, scribes and priests quickly became indignant and pissed off. It's 2000 Years later and those attitudes still exist and "run the show" as they did then. We are still encountering the same type of resistant, close minded, absurd mentality He did, minus the literal scourging and crucifixion, for most of us that is. That subtraction does not apply to all fearless defenders of our God given rights and freedoms of speech, life liberty, and pursuit of happiness. To mention a few; Abraham Lincoln, John F Kennedy, Martin Luther King, and potentially to come people of present that are under great fire like Julian Assange, Kevin Trudeau, Andrew Wakefield, etc...

Again, things on infoexposed are not said to judge or to personally criticize they are said to address the wise that will listen and seek to examine for themselves. Ironically were there to be a criticism made directly of any one specific person, first, to make one would do more harm than good and secondly I wouldn't even know who to address it to as so many of these issues are 'morphed' and intricately intertwined together. We don't need yet another law to "fix it", if anything we need thee undoing of many. How about, "the new covenant". Yeah!!! That gets my vote! This age needs an enema!!!